Hi, > I think we should be good to add the header for Apache v2.0 license: >> src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/cpu_ctc.h >> src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/ctc_helper.h >> src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/gpu_ctc.h >> src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/gpu_ctc_kernels.h >> src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/hostdevice.h > > Please confirm.
Sounds good to me. > For the docs directory, we did something similar to what other popular > Apache projects like spark did: > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/master/docs. (adding docs directory to > rat-excludes) Just because a TLP does something doesn't mean it’s right, the Spark NOTICE file for instance is a right mess. ASF policy is clear on what should be done if you include docs in a release. [1] > At this point I want to ask you what your blocking concerns are. > Is it only the CC-BY-2.5 license for DevGuide.md in googletest submodule or > is it also the missing headers for contrib and the broad rat excludes ? My -1 vote is not a blocker to the release as I said before if you get 3 +1 votes and more +1 than -1 you can release if you want to. IMO (and others may have differing opinions) the missing headers can be fixed in a later release. The main issue is inclusion of Category B content in a non binary form in the release. Thanks, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org