On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:51 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> Hi John, > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:36 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > ...Specific call outs in the README about test data licensing not be > Apache > > license > > - Specific call outs somewhere that the XSDs, ENTs, etc are derived from > > other locations... > > If NetBeans moves their RAT exclusions to a single file which has just > this and is clearly commented, with just a mention of that file in the > README, would that work for you? > > I think having a specific file for RAT exclusions would be good anyway > as it makes it easier to see how they evolve. > I think that's fine. Somewhere that makes it clear to a consumer "this area is the murky area," since we already require disclaimers etc in the source release. Consolidating the overall rat exclusions is useful as well, most projects seem to have named this "rat-exclusions.txt", not sure if that's a convention or not. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
