Got it, thanks Mark and Julian. On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> I agree that standard practice is to not include the site. However, in > Calcite we do include the web site (or rather, the markdown files from > which the site is generated) since the web site is also our documentation. > So, your choice. > > Our site includes Jekyll template code under MIT license and some fonts > under Open Font License, so we had to add a few lines to our LICENSE file. > > Julian > > > > On Jan 18, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On 18/01/18 20:43, Matthew Hayes wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Sorry if this is already answered somewhere but I couldn't find the > >> information. The source code that generates the Apache DataFu website > >> content [1] is currently included in the source code release. However > the > >> source code for the website is independent from the source code and > build > >> files that produce the project artifacts (i.e. JAR files). If the > website > >> source was removed from the release it would have no impact on building > >> these artifacts. Should Apache DataFu continue to bundle the website > >> source in this way or remove it from the release? What is standard > >> practice for other projects? > > > > Standard practice would be not to include it. > > > > Mark > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Matt > >> > >> 1. http://datafu.incubator.apache.org/ > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
