Hi, > Just to be clear. The issue in this case (not to confuse this situation > with MADlib's) isn't what license applies but what copyrights apply.
With a large number of files not having license headers and a mix of Apache, BSD and MIT licenses it’s fairly similar IMO. The 3rd party Apache licensed file should ideally have the header as specified in the appendix of the Apache license. [1[ Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#apply
