On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:09 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Gah, this is what I was trying to convey. But I don't think it's still > 100% correct. > > You need a minimum of 3 +1's > Your net positive votes must be 3 (e.g. if you have a -1 and 5 total votes, > the other 4 votes must be +1's)
I agree with Jim, this net positive condition does not exist. > You need more +1's than -1's > > I'm not sure what is written better. > > (trying to be more anal than Josh, but just to make sure everyone agrees) > > John > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:54 PM Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 6/15/17 1:11 PM, Oliver B. Fischer wrote: >> > >> > Please note: >> > This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes and >> > no -1’s (see [4]). >> >> Just wanted to point out that your description of majority approval is >> wrong. You need at least 3 +1's and more +1's than -1's. -1's are not >> vetos in this case :) >> >> (since I had to be anal about it and correct you, let me take a look at >> your RC too :P) >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >>
