I think a README would be a better name for the explanatory file.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:20 PM, James Bognar <james.bog...@salesforce.com> wrote: > Thanks! > > I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a > LICENSE.txt file to the directory. Hopefully that's enough. > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 6/2/17 1:15 PM, James Bognar wrote: > > > >> I just added several png files to the source tree of our podling. I > >> created them myself. Are there any best-practices on how to mark these > as > >> Apache licensed? > >> > >> > > I'm not sure of a good way to track this. I'm not sure if png supports > > arbitrary metadata which could be edited. Some ways I've seen used > > elsewhere to try to better propagate license/ownership: > > > > * Comments on the issue-tracker issue that introduced them citing > > origin/source (typically for images that are copied, not created) > > * Entry in LICENSE/NOTICE (shouldn't be done unnecessarily, of course) > > * A README in the same directory with relevant info > > > > If the images are of the podling's creation, I wouldn't be particularly > > worried. The copyright notice on your source-release and LICENSE are > > sufficient to inform downstream consumers. > > > > Probably not the answer you're looking for, but hope it helps :) > > > > - Josh > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > James Bognar >
