On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 8:10 PM Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another solution is to do back door politicking where you contact IPMC > members individually and ask them to take a look. Start with members who > have voted on Mahout releases in the past and be specific about what you > would like them do and provide links to artifacts and discussions to make > the job easy. > > That has usually been my best way to succeed on that. > > 9 times out of 10, I ignore those emails. If its someone I don't know, I'll send them over to http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html . I'm not sure who created that page but I like it. We rely first and foremost of podling mentors to review releases. Its much easier to review a release if the mentors have reviewed and given it a once over. We're all volunteers here. To me its also a good sign of mentor engagement seeing the mentors review the releases. > > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> > wrote: > > > That works if human nature is not involved and would still produce the > > same affect so I’d second your request in any case. > > > > However human nature is involved and my proposal would at least guarantee > > that human nature could not hold innocent projects hostage. BTW notice > the > > include vote request, now over a week in with no binding up or down > votes. > > > > > > On Apr 22, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > I agree that lack of IPMC votes is a problem. I don’t think that lowering > > the bar to making a release is the solution. > > > > I wish that each IPMC member would personally commit to voting on two > > release candidates per year. There are so many members of the IPMC that > > this would easily cover all of the votes that come up. > > > > Julian > > > > > > > On Apr 22, 2017, at 8:46 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > > > > > > Probably the wrong place for this but… > > > > > > What do people think about a governance change for approving releases > > through the IPMC to wit: > > > > > > A week of no vote activity over the release proposal of a podling > should > > be considered a passing vote. In other words the IPMC is to become a > > vetoing group. > > > > > > I propose this for 2 reasons: 1) lack of votes or attention from the > > IPMC seems all too prevalent and puts an undo drag on the energy and > > velocity of community involvement. 2) the release has already been voted > on > > and checked by at least 3 PMC members of the podling (which has ASF > mentors > > in most all cases) so a veto role by the IPMC seems to have minimum > danger > > to the ASF system of checks and balances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 19, 2017, at 9:33 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > > > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > > > Next release we could exclude the doc site. Do build files like .sbt > > require licenses? I suppose it can be done in comments. But again can we > > push to next release > > > > > > Can other binding voters have a look? I know everyone is busy but hey, > > tax day is past ;-) > > > > > > > > > On Apr 18, 2017, at 1:00 PM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Luciano, > > > > > > Thanks for your review. I will file JIRAs regarding these files. They > are > > > project build files and documentation. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Donald > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.11.0-incubating-rc2 to be > > >> good > > >>> for a source-only release. This thread is to facilitate a voting for > > the > > >>> IPMC before a final official source-only release. > > >>> > > >>> Vote result on dev@: > > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/031ff6f98b3d5a54b716789bda5068 > > >>> 1a0c821f1054218843ac5fcc77@%3Cdev.predictionio.apache.org%3E > > >>> > > >>> The original vote thread on dev@: > > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1bf205404bf4e16e12f17209f4f20 > > >>> 7722e554ee9e4139974812f8e4@%3Cdev.predictionio.apache.org%3E > > >>> > > >>> The release candidate Git commit is: > > >>> e34a853d0e89baed09b3d3b0c25b244162a3bdea > > >>> > > >>> The release candidate Git tag is: > > >>> v0.11.0-incubating-rc2 > > >>> > > >>> The source-only release candidate artifacts can be downloaded here: > > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/predictionio/0.11.0- > > >>> incubating-rc2/ > > >>> > > >>> Test results of RC2 can be found here: > > >>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/incubator-predictionio/builds/220381611 > > >>> > > >>> Build instructions of previous versions can be used on this RC: > > >>> http://predictionio.incubator.apache.org/install/install-sourcecode/ > > >>> > > >>> Maven artifacts are built from the release candidate artifacts above, > > and > > >>> are provided as convenience for testing with PredictionIO engine > > >> templates. > > >>> The Maven artifacts are provided at the Maven staging repo here: > > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >>> orgapachepredictionio-1016/ > > >>> > > >>> All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion = > > >>> 0.11.0-incubating'. You can view them here: > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > > >>> projectId=12320420&version=12338381 > > >>> > > >>> The artifacts have been signed with Key : 8BF4ABEB > > >>> > > >>> Please vote accordingly: > > >>> > > >>> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.11.0 release > > >>> [ ] 0, neutral because... > > >>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.11.0 release because... > > >>> > > >>> The vote will be open for 72 hours and close at 12pm PDT 4/16/2016. > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Donald > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> I was running RAT on the source distribution and there are a lot of > > unknown > > >> licenses, some might be ok, but many are not, such as: > > >> > > >> *.sbt in projects and sub-projects > > >> *.css in docs > > >> > > >> Other things like signatures, etc seems ok > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Luciano Resende > > >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
