Hi all Am .12.2016, 15:40 Uhr, schrieb Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>:
The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer. Just as a reminder, the specialities are these: - This project already have suffixless releases from before incubation, which are widely used. If the incubation fails, those versions won't be any better that the incubating ones. After all, ASF won't go around and delete those releases from the Maven Central, from SF.net, etc. - The project doesn't have an org.apache.* Maven groupId, nor a such Java package (in 2.x.x, because of backward compatibility, and we are talking about 2.x.x only here). So as far as I see it's quite unlikely that the user will see "Apache" without "incubating" because we have removed it from the *Maven* version number, at least if we change <name>Apache FreeMarker</name> in the POM to <name>Apache FreeMarker (incubating)</name>.
For my point of view, this would be the right solution. As I understand (incubating) should be added to the Project name and not to the version number.
Regards, Raphael -- Mein Blog: https://raphaelbircher.wordpress.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
