+1 to your comments Tim. I'll point out - the statement Ted's made isn't exactly what the board has said.
When I look at the older podlings out there: Wave, ODF, Blur, Streams (as the short list), none of them seem to me like they shouldn't graduate. I almost feel like there's a fear of graduation. It may be we need to encourage them to plan to graduate. You'll also notice in a recent podling report I pointed to a list of podlings who seem to have their acts together well enough to graduate. The IPMC can't force a podling to move along, they have to take the next steps themselves. For the record, if anyone's interested in the whimsy link: https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age John On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:07 PM Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The board is concerned that we have incubating projects that have been > > around for many years. > > > > What is the sense of the incubator about this issue. > > Maybe just tell the board to put away the scalpel? It's not an > instrument that suits them well... if there are un-mentored podlings > doing "bad things" - regardless of tenure - then that would be of > concern to us I reckon... but there isn't evidence of that? > > Thanks, > --tim > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
