And we received another IPMC binding +1 from our mentor Reynold at the SystemML dev list
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01126.html On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:36 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > So I'm comfortable giving a +1 on the release source tarball. It looks > complete enough to pass. > > I am generally concerned about the release management on the podling. We > can follow up. > > John > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:51 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Ping, are there any other issues to be resolved ? Otherwise we would > really > > like to have this reviewed in time for our session on Apache Big Data > early > > next week. > > > > Thanks > > > > On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 : > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > > > 11.0-incubating-rc5/ > > > > > > It only contains the following now : > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5 > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.asc > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.md5 > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.sha > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5 > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.asc > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5 > > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha > > > > > > > > > There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases. > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926 > > > > > > Based on this, here is my +1. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org > > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','johndam...@apache.org');>> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Deron, > > >> > > >> Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you > > some > > >> guidance. https://dist.apache.org/repos/ > dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/ > > >> (and > > >> i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect) > > >> > > >> In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the > > .asc, > > >> .sha1. and the .md5. Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure > > >> that's too important. > > >> > > >> The overall release contents are made up of: > > >> > > >> - Source ZIP file > > >> - POM file for the root of the project > > >> - The convenience binary zip > > >> - The convenience binary .tar.gz > > >> > > >> I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future. I > think > > >> the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what > is > > >> what in your release. If your release only included a single source > > zip, > > >> two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc > > and > > >> md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect. > > >> > > >> John > > >> > > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson < > deroneriks...@gmail.com > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriks...@gmail.com');>> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hello, > > >> > > > >> > Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would > > it > > >> be > > >> > acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following > > >> with > > >> > their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could > > include > > >> > the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the > dist > > >> > artifacts from 9 to 4. > > >> > > > >> > Source distribution: > > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz > > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip > > >> > > > >> > Binary distribution with dependencies: > > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz > > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > > >> 11.0-incubating-rc5/ > > >> > > > >> > Thank you, > > >> > Deron > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende < > luckbr1...@gmail.com > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1...@gmail.com');>> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean < > > >> jus...@classsoftware.com > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jus...@classsoftware.com');>> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the > > >> source > > >> > > > release > > >> > > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from > distributing > > >> > > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal > > >> requirements > > >> > > > > mandated by Apache. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external > > person) > > >> > > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email > doesn’t > > >> > clarify > > >> > > > it. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a > README > > >> to > > >> > > clarify what are the artifacts being released. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from > > >> > > > > our previous release > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess > > but > > >> > > still > > >> > > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have > > >> > > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing > > list: > > >> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache. > > >> > > org/msg01121.html > > >> > > > > >> > > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the > > release > > >> > > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the > > >> SystemML > > >> > > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of > > >> > > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid > > further > > >> > > confusion on the matter. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > Justin > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Luciano Resende > > >> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > >> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from my Mobile device > > > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
