Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Still, the question remain -- for somebody like that, what would be a > criteria > to be added as a committer after the project enters incubation?
Let's stop wasting time -- just provide his name so it can be added to the list, thanks. Geertjan On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Mark Struberg > > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > >> ...Please note that during the incubation people need to either show > that they > >> are eager to engage with the community... > > > > Indeed, but for a well established project like NetBeans I suppose the > > initial committers will recognize some people as soon as they show up, > > as contributors to NetBeans before Apache, and suggest electing them > > quicker than if they were unknown. With such a large project it's > > probably impossible to create a fully fair initial list of committers, > > and fixing that shortly after entering incubation is fine. > > That's what I was asking about. In particular, the person who was inquiring > me off-line about this proposal had a non-trivial amount of commits to > then Sun NetBeans between 2002-2008. He then drifted away from the > project but would be interested, potentially, re-engaging. > > Given the size of the pool of potential candidates like that, I'm not > saying > we should block the VOTE until we get the initial committer list just > right. > > Still, the question remain -- for somebody like that, what would be a > criteria > to be added as a committer after the project enters incubation? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
