On Jul 4, 2016 06:40, "Myrle Krantz" <mkra...@mifos.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > The Fineract site was "dinged" for having the logo and the disclaimer > "buried deep within website".
Unless you were contacted by me to change something in the website, you have not been dinged. They are both at the bottom. But the text > "(incubating)" is at the top right next to the text "Apache Fineract". In > fact, as a result of where it's positioned, the text "(incubating)" shows > up as part of the title in google search results. Putting the incubating > logo at the bottom of the site was purely an aesthetic choice, made after > we checked out the website both on a laptop screen and on a mobile screen. > The decision was not made with the intention to obscure. As to the > disclaimer, where else would you put a disclaimer, but at the bottom? > > I personally feel that the Fineract website follows both the spirit and the > letter of the law when it comes to displaying its incubating status. It > seems from this Audit result though that the IPMC disagrees with me on > this, which makes me doubt that I understand the spirit of the law. Or > perhaps I'm just misunderstanding the audit? > > In any case, the contributors to Fineract are in it for humanitarian > reasons; we don't want to subvert intentions here. If we've got something > wrong, we'd very much appreciate further guidance. > > Also if Apache is going to redesign the logo (+1 non-binding from me on > that one), I hope we keep mobile screens in mind while designing. It's a > corner case for an open source project, but nonetheless, many of our > intended beneficiaries are lucky if they have even a smart phone. > > Greetings from the Voreifel, Germany > Myrle > > > *Myrle Krantz* > Solutions Architect > RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative > mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org > <http://facebook.com/mifos> <http://www.twitter.com/mifos> > > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > OK, I'll fix that when I get a chance. > > > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton < > > dennis.hamil...@acm.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On the other hand, it would be great were the Apache Incubator image > > > linked to something better than http://trafodion.apache.org [;<). > > > > > > As a general observation, the fine print mentioning of Incubator would > > > also serve folks better if there was a link as part of the Incubator > > > mention. > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org in both cases seems good enough. > > > > > > No voting required. > > > > > > - Dennis > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] > > > > Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 00:05 > > > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Notes on branding > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Gunnar Tapper < tapper.gun...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > FYI, "Apache Trafodion" is part of the logo. I'm not putting the > > > > project > > > > > through another round of voting on that one. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wouldn't suggest that either. > > > > > > > > What I was noting was that the text above the log and the text in the > > > > logo > > > > were kind of redundant. > > > > > > > > I sympathize with not wanting to make low priority changes. This was > > > > just a > > > > note. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > > > Gunnar > > *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.* > >
