Part of the incubation process is to fully embrace the tenets of the
Apache Way; considering that MADlib started in Sept 2015 and it is
now June 2016, I would have expected that the page would have been
changed awhile ago. It does beg the question on whether or not
MADlib itself fully groks how important this issue is, allowing the
page to continue as-is for so long...


> On Jun 2, 2016, at 3:52 PM, Gregory Chase <gch...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
> In MADlib's history, contribution was enabled by institutions prior to
> coming to Apache.  However, I agree that this needs to be "historical" not
> "current.
> 
> -Greg
> 
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> 
>> Looking at:
>> 
>>    http://madlib.incubator.apache.org/community.html
>> 
>> I am not sure I like the statement that:
>> 
>>    "including both individuals and institutions. Amongst our current
>> contributors:"
>> 
>> and then a list of entities.
>> 
>> There are only individuals who contribute. Not institutions. In other
>> words, Pivotal is not a "contributor"... nor is ANY institution.
>> 
>> Please fix this. Thx!
>> 
>> PS: I am not on the private@madlib list
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Greg Chase
> 
> Global Head, Big Data Communities
> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
> 
> Pivotal Software
> http://www.pivotal.io/
> 
> 650-215-0477
> @GregChase
> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to