Hi, > Looking at the openssl issue, I want to figure out why we are statically > linking the libraries. If there is a key reason it needs to be static > rather than dynamically linked, then I'll want to go to legal-discuss and > ask whether we can distribute it, given license changes in the works.
Given the 4 clause BSD license is most likely category X I think the only way you can have it as a dependancy is if it is an optional one. [1] Dynamically linking it would be one way of doing that. (But INAL so again it may be good to check on legal discuss.) > the expedient thing is to go ahead with this release, minus the client binary. That works for me and you have my +1 for that. Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
