The current list of initial committers was that provided me by the PredictionIO folks so I have every reason to believe they all have a stake at entering incubation.
It's totally fine with me if we stick to that list. I am just trying to facilitate the fairest process possible. On Friday, May 20, 2016, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > I definitely have concerns about too many folks becoming initial > committers > > and bringing their own corporate agendas to this project. > > > > I suggest that first we vote PIO into incubator then bring in those less > > experienced with the project. We have a good start with people who have > > worked on the project from several orgs. Let us get organized first and > > then bring in new people. > > I think this is a reasonable concern. Andrew, any chance you can look over > the names of initial committers and let us know who has had a stake in the > project before entering the incubation vs. those who are trying to join in > as > part of the ASF Incubation. > > I'm not saying we need to pass judgement one way or the other yet, but it > will be a very useful data point to know before voting. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
