Yes, you are right, we also know that other companies use dataflow
wording (it's the case at Hortonworks for instance).
We gonna start a thread to propose alternative names.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 06:41 PM, Gregory Chase wrote:
This is also a similarly named Spring project:
http://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-dataflow/
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
We're proposing Apache Dataflow naming because Google Cloud Dataflow is
an
already known name and "brand".
I don't see anything in the proposal about Google ceasing the use of the
brand
"Google Cloud Dataflow". Yet the co-existence of "Google Cloud Dataflow"
and
"Apache Dataflow" would conflict with Apache requirements for vendor
neutrality and project independence.
The issue seems similar to the recent proposal to incubate "Apache
OpenMiracl"
while allowing the "Miracl" company to continue distribution of the
"Miracl"
project. That situation was was resolved by renaming the Apache project to
"Milagro", allowing the Miracl company to continue benefitting from the
brand
they had invested in so heavily.
http://markmail.org/message/tpiphl55rcyezcvd
Marvin Humphrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
