Yeup! On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> What might happen, however, is that the discussion is revisited with a > particular focus on the concerns that you've raised. So although it might > be unlikely that the community performs a volte-face and elects for CTR, we > might say "what can we do to limit the risk that RTC inhibits community > growth, without abandoning RTC completely?". At the very least, the > community becomes aware of the concerns, and more sensitive to their > potential impact. > > > On 2 December 2015 at 11:09, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yeah, this is what I meant earlier. Leaving out a commit policy changes > > nothing. The same people who put together the proposal will be the same > set > > as those discussing it as a podling, and they will reach the same > > conclusion. > > > > If the PPMC doubles in size, with fresh faces, then a real discussion can > > happen. Tho I doubt that will be possible -- I'm unaware of any podling > > pulling off such growth. > > On Dec 2, 2015 12:45 PM, "Henry Robinson" <he...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > > > I agree that this is something the Impala community will want to > discuss > > > fairly early on in incubation - along with a lot of other project > > > procedural stuff as we adjust or rethink our workflows to be Apache-Way > > > compatible. > > > > > > Until we have that discussion, I'd expect Impala will continue along > RTC > > > lines simply because this is what the existing community is used to > (and > > I > > > believe, prefers), and the workflows are well established and work > > > smoothly. > > > > > > That is, I personally am ok with no explicit commit protocol, but in > > > practice it is likely to appear as if there is no change, until the > > > community discussion about policies happens during incubation. > > > > > > On 2 December 2015 at 10:08, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Nice +1 =) > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Tom White <tomwh...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > The vote to accept Impala into the incubator has passed > > > > > (http://s.apache.org/u6r), however there are still some concerns > > about > > > > > CTR/RTC. My main takeaways from the CTR/RTC thread are that it's > not > > a > > > > > binary choice, and that it's entirely reasonable that different > > > > > communities have different commit policies at the ASF. > > > > > > > > > > I think Julian Hyde's suggestion that the Impala podling start with > > no > > > > > explicit commit policy is a good one. Incubation should be used as > a > > > > > time to work out what works best for a project. The initial Impala > > > > > community should discuss the commit policy as they go through the > > > > > process of setting up ASF infra and start growing the podling. In > > > > > particular this will include how Gerrit can be used as a tool to > > > > > facilitate reviews, and how that fits with ASF culture, which is > > > > > something that other projects are looking at too. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Henry Robinson > > > Software Engineer > > > Cloudera > > > 415-994-6679 > > > > > > > > > -- > Henry Robinson > Software Engineer > Cloudera > 415-994-6679 >
