This saga jumped the shark right about the time Mary the sonnetor weighted in.
On Thursday, November 26, 2015, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > Sorry Jim. As an attempt to shut down a thread, this wasn't a very good > one. Not a single poster in this thread has a problem with the word, or > the concept of, "review". It is the process that is the issue and what the > impact of that process is upon a community. > > Ralph > > > On Nov 26, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > > OK, ok... we are at diminishing returns here with people > > no longer, imo, listening to what others are saying... > > > > We have, as a foundation, and HAVE HAD RTC and CTR for years > > and decades. There are times when one or the other are Good > > and when they are Bad. Those exact times will, generally, > > vary depending on a lot of factors. > > > > We use the right process when it is Good. > > > > We don't use it when it is Bad. > > > > Just as 'meritocracy' is not a bad word, as much as > > some people wish to re-define it as such, neither is the > > word 'Review'. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > >
