On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:29PM, Harbs wrote: > This kind of underscores my observation that a large part of this debate is > driven by source control technologies. > > RTC seems popular for projects using Git, while CTR seems popular in > communities using SVN.
Well, Apache Bigtop is now _officially_ a CTR after a few months of discussions within the community and a few months of trials. And yeah - we are using git from day one. I don't think Git is particularly empowering RTC - there's nothing in it that requires someone to look over one's shoulder. In Hadoop, HBase and some other projects I've heard about the default review mode is via patch attached to a JIRA ticket. And it has nothing to do with git or svn. Cos > RTC is a LOT easier using Git than SVN if the model is branching. > > FWIW, I personally could swallow using RTC with Git, but I would seriously > have problems with RTC with SVN. > > On Nov 23, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> 3. community building > >> > >> Lots of successful open source projects, both inside and outside ASF, > >> employ RTC. As Todd mentioned, almost all the top 10 most starred (on > >> github) projects use some form of RTC, so it is hard for me to believe that > >> RTC would hinder community building. Of course, one can always argue that > >> if those projects had employed CTR, maybe they would've been even more > >> popular. But then we got into the area that we just have to agree to > >> disagree. > >> > > > > Well, you could also look at openhub.net: > > https://www.openhub.net/orgs/apache ... I believe those top 10 are *all* > > CTR. ... in fact, of ALL projects tracked by openhub, httpd and svn are #2 > > and #4 respectively[*]. They are models of communities where trust rules > > and CTR is the basis of operation. > > > > Using GitHub as a proxy for evaluation skews towards git-based projects, > > whereas openhub is tool independent. >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
