On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >...
> If there is a disagreement, it seems to be part semantics, part version > control technologies (i.e. SVN optimized workflow vs Git optimized > workflow) and part an actual difference in how to handle certain > situations. It seems to me that the actual disagreement is pretty small. ;-) > No, it isn't small. I believe RTC as a standard policy is actively harmful. Proponents use excuses for it, but using RTC for trunk/master is (IMO) always a mechanism for control, exclusion, and a lack of trust of your peers/community. Cheers, -g
