Hello all, I feel like I'm on the verge of getting LICENSE/NOTICE right in all respects in The TinkerPop. . Seems like there's one piece that's out of place and could use some advice as I wasn't able to map anything I'd read in the Apache docs on this topic to my issue. We currently shade several libraries: Kryo, minlog, objenesis, and jackson, essentially re-packaging those binary dependencies in a jar called gremlin-shaded.jar. The gremlin-shaded.jar is then made part of our zip distributions.
As we didn't re-package the source code of these libs, I figured that the source LICENSE/NOTICE didn't need to change and that it was just the binary LICENSE/NOTICE that needed to change. I assume this situation is somewhat similar to a project that builds an uber jar for distribution. So that's where i'm about stuck. I took a wild stab at it and did this: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/blob/5a8b61c09868e22a415c0469a2737d68acce9a4e/gremlin-console/src/main/LICENSE#L226-L228 but I have no idea if that is sufficient (or just plain wrong). If anyone could offer some pointers on what needs to happen here to our binary LICENSE/NOTICE, that would be nice. I'd really like to see us get a clean bill of health on the next LICENSE/NOTICE that goes through a release vote. Thanks for your help, Stephen
