On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:11 AM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > ...we do not have a demand that a release must contain a > test set, so if the release > does not contain the test we cannot see it as broken, or ?...
>From the ASF's point of view you are correct, having tests in a release is not required. OTOH releasing code without tests is...well, suboptimal. But nobody's perfect of course. In Hendrik's case IIUC the tests are present but somewhat broken by depending on Maven snapshots, which makes it a buggy release - but releases are not always perfect either, and I suspect in their case the workaround is easy: release said snapshot and instruct people to replace the appropriate references. That makes it a just a known issue in that release, with a known workaround. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
