Am 07.08.2015 02:50, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote:
[...]
The assumption that you're making is a reasonable one: only PMC is
authorized to make work available (which will mean that everything
else is derived work). That said, I'd appreciate if somebody can
point out to me the basis on which we make an assertion that
only PMC is authorized to produce releases of apache projects.
Official releases are released releases in the apache sense, meaning
there has been a voting and in that the PMC votes are binding. For me
that authorizes the PMC to produce official releases of apache projects.
Of course unreleased releases can in theory be made by everyone.
[...]
IOW, what makes a binary convenience artifact an official ASF
artifact is not whether it got designated as such, but whether it
corresponds to an official source release produced by the PMC.
ok, noted
[...]
Then again nightly builds should be ok, if they will have the
same disclaimer?
No. Nightly builds are special precisely because they don't
correspond to an official source release.
understood
Or is it ok if the nightly build comes from
non-apache?
It is ok, but at that point it becomes 3d party artifact and as
such can't be promoted as part of ASF project.
can't be promoted means no link or description on the web page? Not even
with disclaimer?
[...]
As I said -- that person(*) (even a PMC member of the project) as
a person has even more rights than a PMC does, except in one
crucial area -- that person can NOT speak on behalf of the project
(and that includes linking to that person's artifacts from the PMC
managed assets: website, wiki, etc.).
Other than that, that person is absolutely free to:
#1 produce maven binaries based on, really anything,
including but not limited to snapshot of source tree
#2 distribute those binaries however he/she sees fit
provided they can't be confused with project's binaries.
Modifying versionID while leaving everything else
as-is is considered acceptable.
#2 of course may be subject to constraints of distribution
channel. An example is a recently cited Maven Central
policy where they are NOT allowing to publish SNAPSHOTs
AND they only allow owners of the groupID to publish.
Those constraints, of course, have nothing to do with
ASF or the project -- those are Maven Central constraints.
ok, as long as this is general opinion.
bye blackdrag
--
Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org