On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: > On 24.06.2015 08:34, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>>> Moreover, modules under extdata are test only and are not used anywhere >>> in >>>> the project. They are used to test code deployment functionality. >>> Perhaps it would be best to make it clearer that they are used for test >>> data or better still generate them. Can the files be generated from source? >>> >>>> Would it be OK for us to proceed with this 1.2.0-incubating release and >>> fix >>>> the issues mentioned in the next release shortly after? >>> [1]/[2] The release policy (3.6) is quite clear on this. However if other >>> IPMC members vote +1 I’ll consider changing my vote. >>> >> Hi Justin, >> >> We already have 2 +1 votes from IPMC members: >> >> - Branko Čibej (binding) >> - Konstantin Boudnik (binding) > > FWIW, I agree it would be better to generate these files from source if > possible; however, I don't think it's a showstopper for this release.
I agree with the above statement and would like to unblock this particular poddling release with: +1 (binding) However, I also agree with Justin's point as well and before this poddling can consider graduation I'd like to see an honest attempt at figuring out how to generate these files from source if possible. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
