I am a proposed mentor associated with Pivotal, well away from my own technology and engineering teams. I'm not good enough with darts to hit that side of the org chart from this side of the room, but really would like to see the contribution succeed, so I'm approaching this as always with my ASF hat, as a facilitator and educator. I've had enough conversations to trust that this is doable.
There seem to be no further issues raised, and there have been nearly 2 weeks for more concerns, questions and other commentary. Roman, this appears to be vote-worthy. Incubation can't begin unless incubation is begun... Yours, Bill On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 on what Justin said. And I am not affiliated w/ Pivotal in _any_ way. > > Cos > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 08:10AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > >> On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In > > > > To be clear, there were conversations with Jim (as VP Legal) prior to > > this submission. The ASF wouldn't accept the software grant until the > > Incubator approved the proposal. Pivotal wouldn't release it as ALv2 > > until the ASF accepted the grant. > > > > It's a chicken-and-egg problem - seeing the code through the > > click-through evaluation license is the least bad scenario that drives > > this proposal forward. > > > > As a mentor unaffiliated with Pivotal, I'm not worried about the > > provenance checks - Pivotal is ready to execute the software grant and > > release it as ALv2. >
