Signature file good
Hashes file good
LICENSE file good
NOTICE file exists and GOOD
No 3rd part executables in source package.

+1 binding

Good job


- Henry

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We need one more +1 vote to release. A review would be much appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> Marko.
>
> http://markorodriguez.com
>
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> (sending again as sent from wrong address first time)
>>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> For the source release I checked:
>>> - incubating in artifact name
>>> - signatures and hashes good
>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE ok
>>> - All source files have Apache headers
>>> - No unexpected binary files
>>> - Still can’t compile from source but it tells me I have wrong java version
>>> - most of the issues raised from the last release have been fixed
>>>
>>> Minor issues - please fix for next release.
>>> - No need to add normalise.css  to NOTICE as it is MIT licensed
>>> (Permissive licenses only need to be added to LICENSE in most cases - the
>>> main exceptions being Apache licensed software with NOTICE files and files
>>> that have had their copyright removed). The copyright notice here should go
>>> into LICENSE.
>>> - I'm still not sure of the reason why some of the artefacts are named
>>> gremlin rather than tinkerpop
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to