Thanks Stephen, sounds like a good news. For us the attachments do not matter much, there are not so many. However, keeping track of comments is very important, because some issues have a lot of discussions.
2015-03-16 10:08 GMT+01:00 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com >: > On 16 March 2015 at 08:55, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote: > > > Am 16.03.2015 09:25, schrieb Upayavira: > > > >> When Stephen Connolly says ”We @ Maven will have a full dump of the > >> Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM set > >> up to test migration…” isn’t he implying that the Groovy issues are > >> *included* in that? I.e. there’s not so much for you to worry about > >> here? > >> > > > > Even if Stephen gets a full dump, this does not mean we will get the > > Groovy part out of it. Ben was so far telling us he cannot give it out > like > > that, because of private and internal data in there. Instead he > suggested a > > json export (which most likely will not contain everything) > > > > Well we are getting the full XML dump because that's all you can get via > the XML dump, but whether we get *all* attachments or only those for Maven > is a different question. > > > > > > So unless Stephy has this clear with his employee I stand on the part, > > that we don't have that. > > > Clarification: Ben and I are co-workers. > > > > > > > > bye Jochen > > > > -- > > Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou - Groovy Project Tech Lead > > blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ > > german groovy discussion newsgroup: de.comp.lang.misc > > For Groovy programming sources visit http://groovy-lang.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
