> I think that, one of the big differences is that Singa is written in C++.
Awesome, I'd be the first client. And anything from architectural viewpoint? -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon -----Original Message----- From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:37 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Singa for Apache Incubator On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Edward J. Yoon <edward.y...@samsung.com> wrote: > My coworker is working on implementing DNN on Apache Hama (which supports > general-purpose BSP computing and Pregel-like graph framework). If Hama is > leveraging InfiniBand and GPUs in the future, what will be the major > difference bt Hama-based DistBelief clone and Singa project? > > And, how much performance difference bt async and sync? > I think that, one of the big differences is that Singa is written in C++. Another is that Singa runs now. The present tense is always very powerful when it comes to software. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
