On 10/21/14, 5:57 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> >The problem is that we lack a concise policy document. That's where the >"ASF >release policy codification proposal" as worked through on legal-discuss >a few >months ago is supposed to help. > > http://s.apache.org/aGm > https://github.com/rectang/asfrelease Hi Marvin, IMO, this version of the document also doesn’t prohibit me from updating the binary package without a vote. It seems like some portions of this document is supposed to apply to binary packages like the LICENSE/NOTICE sections so I think that’s why there is still ongoing debate on the Flex mailing list about whether I can in fact modify the FlexJS binary package. At this point, unless someone not on the Flex PMC says that we can’t make the modifications, I am planning to add a new entry to the Flex Installer that points to bits that are hosted on my personal server called “Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 (with Jburg)” and expose it to the general public. All of the compiled bits are the same, but I have added the jburg.jar to the package to workaround the problem. The original binary package will remain on dist/mirrors. Thanks, -Alex
