On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014, at 11:40 AM, John D. Ament wrote: >> The only thing I've noticed is that the dates of the releases are >> missing. I'm not sure that's a big requirement though. > > You mean the final release date, or the length of the vote? Marvin had > said that was optional (length of vote) and I don't see release dates in > previous reports from April/May. > > However, I can add dates tonight if that's OK with everyone - I don't > think that piece is substantial enough to prevent a review prior to > sending to the board.
The dates are a nice-to-have, IMO. However, there's one release-related factoid that *definitely* belongs in the report: ODF Toolkit's release was approved using the alternative voting process worked out last November/December. I believe that's the first official release in the history of the Foundation that passed with binding votes by non-PMC members. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
