The reasoning behind this was that our project was ready to release a new version but the Apache infrastructure was not yet set up. Therefore, we decided (together with our mentors) to make a release outside Apache, while being formally accepted into the incubator.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, with a very new project, it is important to know that they have done > releases before coming to Apache. > > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> > wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 6:08 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > If anyone from Flink can answer... as well as IPMC members. > > > > > > You have this listed in your report: > > > > > > Date of last release: > > > > > > 2014-05-31 (no incubator release yet) > > > > > > I don't think we can list non-incubator releases in the report. > > > > It's true that that pre-Apache releases are not what the IPMC or the > > Board is looking for, and though it's not a big deal it's probably > > better not to list such releases in the future. But at least Flink > > made it clear that they weren't talking about an Apache release. > > > > My vote would be to keep it in because I think we should leave the > > Podling's work intact if we can. > > > > Marvin Humphrey > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
