I always was curious about if podling has both a group of PPMC members and a group of committers. When consider TLP graduation, all committers should be PPMC members?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:59 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > There have been a couple of graduations recently where (I think) the > podling expected to be able to specify the initial list of committers > as different from the PMC. In at least one case the podling did not > realise that the names on the board resolution comprise the initial > PMC. > > I think there are two issues here: > - clarify that the board resolution names really are the whole PMC and > nothing but the PMC (!) > The resolution template itself likely cannot be changed, but there > must be descriptions of the process somewhere that can be improved. > > - consider whether it is necessary to allow creation of a TLP with > additional initial committers not on the PMC. > If so, what is the process? > If not, probably a good idea to ensure it is clearly stated how the > PMC can add the additional committers once the TLP resources have been > created by Infra. > > Thoughts? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Edward J. Yoon (@eddieyoon) Chief Executive Officer DataSayer, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org