I always was curious about if podling has both a group of PPMC members
and a group of committers. When consider TLP graduation, all
committers should be PPMC members?

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:59 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There have been a couple of graduations recently where (I think) the
> podling expected to be able to specify the initial list of committers
> as different from the PMC. In at least one case the podling did not
> realise that the names on the board resolution comprise the initial
> PMC.
>
> I think there are two issues here:
> - clarify that the board resolution names really are the whole PMC and
> nothing but the PMC (!)
> The resolution template itself likely cannot be changed, but there
> must be descriptions of the process somewhere that can be improved.
>
> - consider whether it is necessary to allow creation of a TLP with
> additional initial committers not on the PMC.
> If so, what is the process?
> If not, probably a good idea to ensure it is clearly stated how the
> PMC can add the additional committers once the TLP resources have been
> created by Infra.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>



-- 
Edward J. Yoon (@eddieyoon)
Chief Executive Officer
DataSayer, Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to