top-posting first, then a bit inside the original email; I am +1 with regards to Allura 1.1.0 + changes, but still -1 on the release candidate. If you were to spin up a new RC with the proposed/fixed things, then I would be +1 towards that.
On 02/18/2014 12:54 AM, Dave Brondsema wrote: > On 2/16/14 6:28 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> -1. files check out, but Allura doesn't work :( >> >> checksums match, installation works, though not very well on ubuntu >> minimal 13.10, dependencies cannot be met, I had to rewrite >> requiements-common.txt to use Ming 0.4.3 instead of 0.4.2 which doesn't >> exist, and libtidy was changed to 0.1.2 as 0.2.1 wasn't available. > > Not sure why Ming 0.4.2 wasn't available for you. Can you provide more > details > of how you tried to install it and what the error was? I see it at > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Ming/0.4.2 and this works fine for me as a > simple test: As we discussed on IRC, this is due to pip 1.5.2 having a different set of rules for handling external resources. I have noted that you have set about to changing the installation instructions, which is great. I have also noted that the Ming-0.4.2 package has been made available now my Tim, so the only 'troublemaker' left is the tidylib. > > $ virtualenv /tmp/venv > $ source /tmp/venv/bin/activate > $ pip install Ming==0.4.2 > > And https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pytidylib/ is there, for 0.2.1 > >> >> Created account, created project, went to admin it...and FAILURE! >> >> Line 913 in allura/lib/plugin has "else: ", when it should have "elif >> app in g.entry_points['tool']:" - it breaks the entire site when viewing >> the admin tab. I have checked on multiple machines, and I get this error >> all the time. > > That does look like a good change. I presume when you were installing and the > INSTALL said "And now to setup the Allura applications for development. If > you > want to setup all of them, run `./rebuild-all.bash`" that you chose the 2nd > option to just install individual tools and didn't install all of them (e.g. > ForgeTracker)? If all were installed, I don't think you'd get an error there. > At first I did not bother installing everything, as I assumed this wasn't necessary. I have since tried it with the full install, and it did not produce the same error then, but I still think the change to the plugin file is necessary for a release to be sane. Many people will probably run into this error as well if they only do a minimal installation. With regards, Daniel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
