On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi sebb, > > What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file? > > Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the file(s) involved. > Thanks, > > Taylor > >> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can >> stay as 2013. >> >> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license >> provided with the files. >> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file. >> >> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream >> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not >> required. >> >> >>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <sur...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >>> +1 (binding) from me. >>> >>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I >>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies >>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release >>> and can be addressed later. >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks for the input! >>>> >>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and >>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!. >>>> >>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but >>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license. >>>> >>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing >>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it. >>>> >>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if >>>> that is a blocker for release or not. >>>> >>>> - Taylor >>>> >>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version >>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm. >>>> >>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes >>>> (6 >>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes. >>>> >>>> Release Vote: >>>> >>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44c5baad-0fd8-454c-84d7-c8da92442...@gmail.com%3e >>>> >>>> Release Vote Result: >>>> >>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3a207f1c-3b07-4029-93d4-87abeb412...@gmail.com%3e >>>> >>>> >>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c >>>> >>>> >>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013. >>>> >>>> The NOTICE file also references software from >>>> >>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo! >>>> >>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file. >>>> >>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above? >>>> If so, where are the license files? >>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file? >>>> >>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually >>>> included in the distributiion. >>>> >>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz >>>> >>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3 >>>> >>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd >>>> >>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here: >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/ >>>> >>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found here: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3 >>>> >>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating. >>>> >>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating >>>> [ ] 0 No opinion >>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Apache Storm Team >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://hortonworks.com/download/ >>> >>> -- >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to >>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, >>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader >>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that >>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or >>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have >>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately >>> and delete it from your system. Thank You. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
