On Feb 8, 2014, at 10:47 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> WDYT?
>> 
>> Non-trivial; maintaining the meta-data needed to accurately generate
>> the NOTICE file is likely to require more effort than writing the
>> NOTICE file itself.
>> 
> 
> 
> Actually, this sounds like a case where the effort for any individual
> project outweighs the benefit of saving the time, but the total effort
> across many projects would make the effort somewhat worth while.  In
> particular, something that enhances the communication between projects and
> between the author of the dependency and the users of that dependency would
> be very helpful.
> 
> As such, this sounds like a great thing to add to maven.  If it provided me
> with a way to look at all my dependencies and examine my notices file for
> missing acknowledgments, that would be helpful.  Moreover, if there were a
> way for the community of users to upload sample acknowledgements and for
> the owners of such packages to reject or accept these acknowledgments, this
> would crowdsource the effort of approval.

Maven and other build tools.  If we had a canonical database then people would 
be free to create any kind of tooling they wished.

> My guess is that since getting NOTIFICATIONS right is a largely one shot
> deal, it wouldn't be enough appeal to encourage somebody to actually
> implement the system, but it would certainly make one's life easier in
> small installments.

That’s the predicament of a tool smith.


Regards,
Alan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to