Hi IPMC members, Olingo is waiting to get a third vote for our current release candidate. We would really appreciate if someone could have a look at this.
Thanks & Best Regards, Christian -----Original Message----- From: Dave Brondsema [mailto:d...@brondsema.net] Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 23:06 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03) On 2/4/14 6:39 AM, Amend, Christian wrote: > Hi Dave, > > thanks for your feedback :) > > The parent zip file is a pure source distribution. The README contains this > paragraph because we have these dependencies when building or deploying our > project but they are not included in the zip file and thus are not mentioned > in the LICENSE file. > If you have a look at our dist-* (e.g. dist-ref) packages they contain the > necessary licenses in the LICENSE file for the binary sources they include. I see. Your dist-* zip files look from what I can tell. However, I would like it if another IPMC member could take a look and give you the 3rd +1, since I do not have a lot of experience assessing licensing for binary jar releases. > > The sha files were built with sha512 and I think we will change the naming > there for the next release to make this more clear. > > The way I understood the paragraph in [1] is that if you make changes to the > mandatory text it has to be approved by the Incubator PMC. Since we did not > change this and only added our website at the end I hope this is within the > acceptable range. Nevertheless if this is no show stopper I will address this > on our mailing list after the release. Right, it probably is just fine how you have it, so not a show stopper. Just a little bit more proper for a future release. > > Thanks & Best Regards, > Christian > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Brondsema [mailto:d...@brondsema.net] > Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 06:52 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03) > > Hello Christian, and Olingo team. > > So far I have only looked at > olingo-odata2-parent-incubating-1.1.0-RC03-source-release.zip since it seemed > like the main source file. I also haven't tried to build it, since it's been > a > long time since I've done any Java :) > > The last section in the README file states there are dual licenses, weak > copyleft dependencies, etc, and refers to the LICENSE file for details. The > LICENSE file only has the AL2 in it. Are there additional licenses used in > Olingo? If so, they should be properly referenced in the LICENSE file. If > not, > the README shouldn't state such things. I wouldn't put any licensing info in > the README either way, the LICENSE file should cover that in a single > document. > > The DISCLAIMER file has extra content (after the 3rd paragraph) that is not > needed. It doesn't seem harmful to me, but > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers is pretty clear > about using exact text without changes. I also agree with Francesco on your > dev > list about removing blank lines from NOTICE. > > What format are the .sha files? I tried all the sha*sum commands on my system > and none produced anything even similar. I suggest naming them *.sha1 or > *.sha512 for example. > > -Dave > > > On 1/31/14 9:18 AM, Amend, Christian wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> This is a call for a vote on Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating. This is our 3rd >> try >> of our 2nd release. We have resolved all issues which were discussed since >> our >> 1st release candidate. >> >> Apache Olingo is a library implementing OData V2 protocol specification. >> >> A vote was held on the Olingo developer mailing list and it passed with >> eight +1 >> votes where two +1 votes came from our mentors. The vote had zero -1 or 0 >> votes >> (see the vote thread [1] and result thread [2]), and now requires a vote on >> this >> list. >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 >> IPMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> >> Best Regards, >> Christian >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ugfeqpzjxrnedpqn >> [2] http://markmail.org/message/uiklgm25o7upks3t >> >> Resources ======== >> >> The release candidate is available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~chrisam/olingo2/1.1.0-RC03/ >> >> The release candidate has been signed through the key 475D9522 in: >> http://keyserver.kjsl.org:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x475D9522&op=vindex >> >> The project KEYS file is available here: >> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/olingo/KEYS >> >> The release candidate is based on the sources tagged with 1.1.0-RC03: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-olingo-odata2.git;a=commit;h=58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a >> and is based on the following commit id: >> 58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > -- Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net http://www.brondsema.net : personal http://www.splike.com : programming <>< --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
