> >> My $0.1: stick with the language rather than with the platform: >> >> *-js/ >> *-objc/ >> *-cs/ >> >> >> As an example, the Java packages ar3e being named as follows > > previous: org.usergrid > new: org.apache.usergrid > > Can you please elaborate on how (if required at all) we should name the > packages for the above languages e.g. js, objc, cs, etc? > Thanks if your able to help me clear this one up. > best > Lewis
Hello Lewis, Sorry to have confused you: I do certainly do not want to waste anyone's time. This is indeed my suggestion: use package names that indicate the language binding rather than the target platform. The main reason is that several languages bindings may land on a single target platform, the opposite being generally not true. All the Best. --FiX --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
