I just can speak for the Hama-to-Yarn use case (with my newbie hat on) and it seems Hoya may be really helpful as the entry point to address it as it provides a set of simple and useful tools. For the sake of the names I think Hoya would be good (while Hyena would not).
Just my 0.02 cents, Tommaso 2014/1/17 Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com> > On 16 January 2014 12:41, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > @Steve I'm curious to know if also Apache Hama may leverage Hoya to be > > deployed on YARN. > > > > > If you are going to make a 100% commit to running in YARN -which, if you > aren't ready yet, Hama should be able to do in some point in the future- > then I'd say "go for it!" and then point you at Twill to get you started. > > If all you are trying to do is deploy the BSP daemons in a YARN cluster, > and they don't need any persistent localfs storage, then Hoya should work. > You already use ZK for the binding mechanism, don't you? > > > If yes, that'd hopefully bring some more people involved from Hama as well. > > > > > That'd be great! > > -- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >
