--------------------
Aurora
Justin Mclean (jmclean):
Project is off to a good start with lots of activity on the mailing list
and in JIRA. Mentors are not very active but there are no issues that
need attention.
--------------------
BatchEE
John Ament (johndament):
BatchEE is a new podling, with a small team working on it currently.
It's a fork of the RI for Java Batch from Java EE 7. I think short term
they should focus on getting a release out there to draw in community
interest; which should help build the podling more and drive feature
interest.
--------------------
Celix
Dave Fisher (wave):
This podling is growing. They plan a release soon and let's see how that
goes. When it comes time for graduation I have some concerns that this
podling's community may be too small.
--------------------
log4cxx2
Christian Grobmeier (grobmeier):
the podling is just getting started
--------------------
MetaModel
Roman Shaposhnik (rvs):
In general project seem to be on the right track with a healthy amount
of community interaction happening over the mailing list and a strong
desire to do a release. Two issues have caught my attention though:
1. I am not quite sure what motivated a strong drive towards having
by-laws this early in the game. In my experience the focus on by-laws
can, at times, put a damping factor on community growth. IOW, what
I've seen in the past is that communities try to come up with by-laws
when the usual process of consensus building starts to fail. Nothing
actionable here for the project -- just keep this in mind.
2. The JIRA feels a bit empty for the project that has been developing
for more than 6 month (grand total of 33 issues). At the same time
the number of commits in the Git repo is on par with the development
pace. What it tells me is that there's no strong correlation between
JIRAs and commits. This raises a red flag of whether all of the
changes that are committed get a proper community vetting before they
go in. I couldn't find any traces of the review requests either:
https://reviews.apache.org/groups/metamodel/
This in my opinion is a pretty big concern for the project.
--------------------
ODF Toolkit
John Ament (johndament):
ODF Toolkit has been incubating for a long time. Activity on their list
is in frequent, but active enough that it still is running. Considering
what the project is, I think the best resolution for this podling is to
graduate as a sub project under something like OpenOffice or POI.
--------------------
Olingo
(No shepherd review filed.)
--------------------
Ripple
Roman Shaposhnik (rvs):
The project appears to be doing well
--------------------
Samza
(No shepherd review filed.)
--------------------
Sirona
(No shepherd review filed.)
--------------------
Spark
Alan Cabrera (acabrera):
Seems like a nice active project. IMO, there's no need to wait import
to JIRA to graduate. Seems like they can graduate now.
--------------------
Stratos
Raphael Bircher (rbircher):
The project looks realy active. Continue like this guys!
--------------------
Twill
(No shepherd review filed.)
--------------------
VXQuery
Raphael Bircher (rbircher):
The mailing list traffic is not very high. However, the basic
discussions are on the lists.
--------------------
Usergrid
(No shepherd review filed.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
