+1 On Dec 13, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So it begins =) > > +1 > > Thanks for leading the effort, Marvin > > - Henry > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey > <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting process, >> I propose that we run an experiment allowing the PPMC members of select >> podlings to earn binding votes under limited circumstances by completing a >> release checklist. >> >> For participating podlings, the Incubator's release management guide... >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html >> >> ... would be supplanted by the following documents: >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release_manifest.txt >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html >> >> The scope of this VOTE is limited to approving the following patch to our >> policy page: >> >> https://paste.apache.org/k4vJ >> >> Here is the patch content minus markup: >> >> 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process >> >> Select podlings pre-cleared by a majority vote of the IPMC MAY >> participate in >> an alternate release voting process: >> >> Should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling SHALL >> hold a vote on the Podling's dev list and create a permanently archived >> Release Manifest as described in the Experimental Release Guide. At least >> three +1 votes from PPMC members are required (see the Apache Voting >> Process page). If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the >> Podling >> SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and >> formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. >> >> Formal approval requires three binding +1 votes and more positive than >> negative votes. Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are always >> binding. For all releases after the first, votes cast by members >> of the PPMC >> are binding if a Mentor approves the Release Manifest. >> >> Please note that the proposed change is both incremental and reversible: >> >> * It is incremental because podlings must be opted in by vote of the IPMC >> to >> participate. >> * It is reversible because once the experiment has run its course the >> policy change can be reverted with zero impact through lazy consensus. >> >> Those who may have questions about the legitimacy of allowing binding votes >> from non-IPMC members should see this post from Roy Fielding: >> >> http://s.apache.org/v7 >> >> Please vote: >> >> [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. >> [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment. >> >> This majority VOTE will run for 7 days and will close at 13:00 PST on Friday, >> December 20, 2013. Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are binding. >> >> Here is my own +1. >> >> Marvin Humphrey >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
