Oooh, OK Jim, gotcha I didn't understand the first time.
-----Original Message----- From: Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013 12:49 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards > >On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013 12:31 PM >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards >> >>> >>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The Incubator has a fundamental structural flaw: it lacks a mechanism >>>>to >>>> reward merit earned by individual podling contributors. >>> >>> Idea: Allow for podlings to nominate, and elect, Podling "chairs" >>> which can cast Mentor-like votes. >> >> +1 to me this is the Champion role > >No, I mean someone from the PPMC. For example, in the Allura >case, the podling could nominate and elect Dave as podling >chair and he would have Mentor powers. > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
