Oooh, OK Jim, gotcha I didn't understand the first time.
-----Original Message----- From: Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013 12:49 PM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards > >On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> >> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> >> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013 12:31 PM >> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards >> >>> >>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The Incubator has a fundamental structural flaw: it lacks a mechanism >>>>to >>>> reward merit earned by individual podling contributors. >>> >>> Idea: Allow for podlings to nominate, and elect, Podling "chairs" >>> which can cast Mentor-like votes. >> >> +1 to me this is the Champion role > >No, I mean someone from the PPMC. For example, in the Allura >case, the podling could nominate and elect Dave as podling >chair and he would have Mentor powers. > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
