I should have added: please do address the problems here and re-roll and I will be sure to examine that release in a timely fashion. Don't let a -1 discourage you, as most incubating projects have to go through a learning curve.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 06:59 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hi Ali, > > Comments inline. > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 05:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > > > The result from the wave-dev vote can be found at: > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCABRGrVfPOwN3E8N-uScruYbxdezpfZzAJHMp8dN%2BUfpF6s%2BDGw%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > I find this slightly confusing as I expected at least 3 PPMC votes, but > I guess Wave has opted for the committer == PPMC model? > > > Wave 0.4 RC3 artefacts are available at: > > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/ > > Note: The checksums are SHA-512's > > A couple of things: > > - Preferably, you'd only include *one* set of artifacts to vote on. Am I > voting on the zip, the bz2? I'm uncomfortable voting without checking > out all the source releases as I have no way of knowing that the zip == > the bz2 release without inspecting both. > > - Preferably, there'd be no binary release in the artifacts you're > asking to have voted on. Convenience binaries are fine, but they're not > an official release, so it'd be better not to include them with the > files we're meant to be voting on. > > - I have to -1 this as there are several binary (.jar) files included in > the release that don't belong in a source release. (under > third_party/codegen/*) > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
