On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: > I trust someone who believes this is a fixed rule rather than a > social-norm by which we are guided will now go and document it > appropriately in [2] (see ISSUE 09 [1]).
Your change to the "process description" page seems fine to me. I also went and augmented the proposal guide with a wiki snippet which can be copied and pasted into a proposal wiki page to mark it as final. Marvin Humphrey http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#vote Index: content/guides/proposal.xml =================================================================== --- content/guides/proposal.xml (revision 1494448) +++ content/guides/proposal.xml (working copy) @@ -187,8 +187,15 @@ proposal should be put to the <a href='entry.html#vote'>vote</a>. If the wiki is used to develop the proposal, please ensure that the wiki matches the final proposal then add a notice to the wiki that development of the document is -now complete. +now complete: </p> +<source> +---- +/!\ '''FINAL''' /!\ + +This proposal is now complete and has been submitted for a VOTE. +---- +</source> </section> </section> <section id="proposal-template"> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
