On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Luciano, > > Thanks for the actionable feedback. Will work on it. > > Also, had a question about what goes into the NOTICE (and COPYRIGHT) file. > > According to > http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices > > "Apache releases should contain a copy of each license, usually contained > in the LICENSE document. For many licenses this is a sufficient notice. For > some licenses some additional notice is required. In many cases, this will > be included within the dependent artifact" > > > I might be reading it wrong, but I thought this meant that we don't have to > add 3rd party notices to our NOTICE file, since we are 1) including their > LICENSE in our LICENSE file and 2) including the source tar balls of 3rd > party components and each tar ball has its NOTICE in it. > > Yes, looks like it's acceptable to have the copyright notices together with the license. Just make sure there are nothing on different files, as I think I saw a copyright notices in one of the dependencies readme.txt -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
