Anyone else interested to join? We are still looking for mentors / initial contributor. If you are working with OSGi, Karaf, Activiti, Cloud APIs or Puppet it would be great to have you on-board as a mentor or contributor.
I am at ApacheCon in Portland - feel free to get in touch if you want to know more. -- Andrei Savu On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Andrei Savu <savu.and...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think the following presentation does a better job at explaining the > scope of Provisionr: > > > http://www.slideshare.net/savu.andrei/creating-pools-of-virtual-machines-apachecon-na-2013 > > Regards, > > -- Andrei Savu > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Benson Margulies > <bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Tom White <tom.e.wh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Andrei Savu <savu.and...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Tom do you want to be a champion for this proposal? >> > >> > Yes, I'd be happy to. >> > >> > One thing I think is worth discussing more here is whether Provisionr >> > should be a TLP on graduation, or whether it should be a module in >> > Whirr. >> >> >> Well, that puts this proposal into a gray area. In case you haven't >> been reading all the traffic on this list, I'll give a quick summary >> here. >> >> Historically, the Foundation had 'subprojects', and the the incubator >> hosted podlings intended, eventually, to become subprojects of >> existing TLPs. We don't do that anymore. If Provisionr becomes part >> of Whir, it just becomes, well, part of Whir. >> >> That raises the question of what you need the incubator for if this is >> your goal. There's a pretty simple alternative. The existing >> Provisionr team works with Whir to do an IP grant of the code to the >> Foundation. The existing team submits ICLAs. Whir makes a branch or >> other distinctive tree in source control and grants the Provisionr >> team commit access _to that tree_. Over time, the Provisionr people >> earn full committer status by merit, and appropriate adjustments are >> made to the tree structure. >> >> Given the state of the conversation about policy on this subject, I >> think it would be reasonable to ask you all to talk to the Whir people >> about this, and see if you an all come to an agreement for something >> like this in parallel with a discussion here. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >
