On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > My viewpoint: I can see benefit to Curator both as a TLP and as part of ZK. > One of my hopes of this process is to get an idea of what the community > wants. Curator has been doing well outside of Apache. But, it's become clear > to me that "limited devs - single company" is a hinderance to wider adoption > and growth of Curator. It's because of this that I thought the Incubator > would be the perfect place for Curator at this point. From the FAQ: > > * "The Incubator, among other things, is where the due-diligence of making > sure the licence is correct" > * "The Incubator is also the place where projects can familiarize themselves > with how the ASF works under the guidance of Incubator PMC members" > > Also, my reading of the Incubator docs shows that graduation does not > necessarily mean TLP. I was hoping that, via Incubation, Curator's future > could be explored and defined. If that means a Curator TLP, that's great. If > it means something else, that's great too. > > -Jordan >
+1, We don't need to discuss exit criteria before entering incubation. And if the Zookeeper PMC wants to adopt Curator as part of the Zookeeper project (see distinction from sub-project language, which is what the Board does not favor), they can work with the community and do it.... Having said that, the exit criteria should really be an option instead of being dictated. BTW, if you guys are still looking for mentors, please count me in. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
