Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:22:42 +0100: > On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100: > >> On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote: > >>> Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just > >>> need to add a field to it we can. > >> Nope, I'm currently walking the incubator archive tree. The clutch > >> metadata is in general good enough, since if clutch can generate > >> target/current.ent, I can certainly get the information I need from > >> that. The only question is the conversion from > >> l...@podling.incubator.apache.org (which clutch knows about) to > >> archive/podling.apache.org/list (which is where the podling mail > >> archives will be in future) is consistent. > >> > > Yes, it is, for all *@p.i.a.o lists. > > Well, I've found an inconsistency while changing the scripts to parse > the content/podlings.xml and content/projects/<podling-name>.xml. > Onami's dev list is the old-style: > > onami-...@incubator.apache.org > > but its archive is new-style: > > onami.incubator.apache.org/dev > > I don't want to special-case the script for this; can we make the > archive consistent with the mailing list address? >
They seem consistent with the other "new-style" podlings: minotaur,9:~apmail/public-arch% find . -maxdepth 2 -name \*onami\* ./onami.apache.org minotaur,9:~apmail/public-arch% grep -h List-Id onami.apache.org/*/* | uniq List-Id: <commits.onami.incubator.apache.org> List-Id: <dev.onami.incubator.apache.org> List-Id: <user.onami.incubator.apache.org> Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
