Gary, I recommend that you start by politely asking your mentors.
If you, or one of these other projects, don't have enough active mentors to pass a release vote, I recommend that you recruit more mentors. One possibility is that one the participants could join the IPMC; we have voted in people who have demonstrated enough grasp of the requirements. I am a pessimist about getting releases reviewed 'in the cloud' of miscellaneous members of this PMC. --benson On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Gary Martin <gary.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: > On 18/01/13 11:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Christian, >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Christian Grobmeier >>> <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> ...Can we somehow find a way to highlight currently running votes?... >>> >>> Isn't the [VOTE] tag in subject sufficient? >>> You could filter those threads to a different mail folder to make sure >>> you don't miss them. >> >> In theory yes. But on the other hand i already have tons of gmail >> labels (counting asf lists only). >> >> There are some [VOTE]s open for a pretty long time. Basically this is >> the problem i wanted to address. > > > I suspect that [VOTE]s remaining open frustrates a number of incubator > projects. There currently seem to be 5 ongoing votes at this point which are > (I think I have these ordered by last response time): > > [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release - open 13 days > [VOTE] Release Apache Onami-Test 1.4.0-incubating - open 3 hours > [VOTE] Release Apache Onami-Logging 3.4.0-incubating - open 3 hours > [VOTE] - Apache Clerezza Graduation Resolution - open 5 days > [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.4 (incubating) - open 5 days > > Sorry if I missed any. Two of the above have just started but of the others, > two took (or are still taking) a fairly long time to get started. > > Regarding the original suggestion, a web based tool would only seem to be > useful if the problem is associated with IPMC members not noticing rather > than not feeling that they have time to do proper reviews. Has this been > determined yet? Are there any other possible reasons? > > Finally, a shameless request: please can we get more people reviewing the > Bloodhound vote? > > Cheers, > Gary --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
