Cancelling this vote. Will create a RC5 based on the comments below. > -----Original Message----- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:59 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC4 release > > On 9 January 2013 13:13, Chen, Pei <pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu> > wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > >> In (almost) all other podlings it is at the top of the SVN tree. > >> IMO it should be present alongside NOTICE and LICENSE so it is > >> obvious to people browsing SVN. > > Thanks for the input. I already made this change in SVN trunk so it'll > automatically be picked up in future release. And also updated the 2013 > copyright. > > Since, maven puts it in correct place in the artifacts during packaging, I > presume this won't be a show stopper for the release? > > The location of the DISCLAIMER in the tar file looks fine. > Minor issue - the text is all on one line. This makes it quite hard to read; > please fix this for the next release. > > However, I have now had a look at the embedded NOTICE file. > This is very long - it contains lots of unnecessary notices. > > For example, there is no need to credit OpenNLP or UIMA as these are > covered under the second paragaph. > > The NOTICE file must only be used for *required* notices (whereas the > LICENSE file must contain copies of all licences). > Furthermore, the N&L files should only contain entries which relate to > software that is actually included in the archive. > The NOTICE file should be as short as possible (but no shorter). > > AFAICT the archive does not include JUnit; there may be other "missing" > references. > > The NOTICE file must only contain *required* notices for the enclosing > archive - if the archive does not contain JUnit then the NOTICE file does not > require any attribution. Even software that is included may not require an > entry in the NOTICE file if the license does not specifically require it. > > The N&L files are a vital part of ASF releases, so I think this should be > fixed > please. > > > --Pei > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 6:19 AM > >> To: general@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC4 release > >> > >> On 9 January 2013 01:38, Chen, Pei <pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPad > >> > > >> > On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:18 PM, "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 8 January 2013 22:19, Chen, Pei > >> >> <pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu> > >> wrote: > >> >>> Hi, > >> >>> > >> >>> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as > >> >>> Apache > >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. This will be our first release. > >> >>> > >> >>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list and passed with 5 +1s: > >> >>> > >> >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ctakes- > >> dev/201212 > >> >>> > >> > .mbox/%3c924de05c19409b438eb81de683a942d9259...@chexmbx1a.chb > >> OSTON.O > >> >>> RG%3e > >> >>> > >> >>> We need an additional IPMC vote. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> For more detailed information on the changes/release notes, > >> >>> please > >> visit: > >> >>> > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId= > >> >>> 123 > >> >>> 13621&version=12322969 > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> The release was made using the cTAKES release process documented > >> >>> here: > >> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/ctakes/ctakes-release-guide.html > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> The candidate is available at: > >> >>> > >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc4/tar > >> >>> get /apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> The tag to be voted on: > >> >>> > >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0. > >> >>> 0-i > >> >>> ncubating-rc4/ > >> >> > >> >> NOTICE file still shows 2012 (not critical) > >> >> > >> >> There is no Incubation DISCLAIMER file in the tag I assume it is > >> >> missing from the release artifacts as well. > >> >> The disclaimer is vital. > >> > The DISCLAIMER file should already be included in the release > >> > artifacts... > >> It's pulled in from the ctakes-distribution module. > >> > >> I see now. > >> > >> In (almost) all other podlings it is at the top of the SVN tree. > >> IMO it should be present alongside NOTICE and LICENSE so it is > >> obvious to people browsing SVN. > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
