Recently there had been a brief discussion on the Apache Stanbol mailing list about processing DOAP with Stanbol for something.
Suggestions are welcome. Cheers, Andreas --- Shane Curcuru: > DOAP files are required for all TLPs, per the Branding policy: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs > > DOAP files are used to autogenerate the projects listing site: > > http://projects.apache.org/indexes.html > > DOAP files are the best way we have currently to ensure we have a > single, simple and machine-parseable list of all software projects > available at the ASF. We currently under-utilize this: it would be nice > if projects had more detailed DOAPs that we could entice people to > create interesting visualizations of all Apache projects. It should > also be linked to more, so that newcomers to the ASF have an easier way > to find all the different software technologies that Apache projects > have to offer to the world. > > From the brand perspective, DOAPs are required so the ASF can track all > formal TLP projects and major software products that our projects ship > (among other reasons, so we can one day auto-generate our list of > trademarks). DOAPs should also have sufficient information about > software downloads available so that if someone does write a crawler to > inspect software products, they'll get useful information. > > It would be nice if projects kept DOAPs up to date with all new > releases, etc., but I personally don't have the effort available in the > near future to push on that area. What's more important is ensuring all > TLPs have at least a basic DOAP that's checked in and reflected at > projects.a.o > > We really need to explain this more clearly in the incubator docs, and > make it clear that having a DOAP checked in is part of the branding > checklist that is required to complete before graduation. I.e., we > should ensure that podlings meet the Project Branding Requirements > before they go to graduate. > > - Shane > > > On 1/2/2013 5:08 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Onami is not listed below, but we have a Doap file (which needs some >> maintenance :-) >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/committers/doap_Onami.rdf >> >> Three questions, because I am not so familiar with Doap files. >> >> 1) do we have to add them manually to: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/files.xml >> >> >> 2) On onami we maintain several independent components. Should we >> maintain different doap files (one for each component), like it seems >> to be done by Commons? >> >> 3) Should the doap file become part of the release? >> >> thanks! >> Christian >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Benson Margulies >> <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi there. >>> >>> In the process of cleaning up photark, I noticed that very few >>> incubating projects have DOAP files. >>> >>> That is, I looked at >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/files.xml. >>> >>> >>> If that page is stale and DOAP-i-ness happens elsewhere, someone >>> please fill me in and excuse this noise. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
